Enzo Maresca, the current Chelsea manager, is under immense pressure. Ruud Gullit understands this feeling very well, knowing what it`s like to manage under constant scrutiny.
Gullit, who also managed Newcastle, was removed from both positions against his wishes when results declined, and support from players and fans waned.
In February 1998, former Chelsea chairman Ken Bates sacked Gullit, despite his FA Cup victory the previous year, which was the club`s first significant silverware in 26 years.
He believes that despite changes in ownership and periods of success, the underlying issues at Chelsea remain similar 27 years later.
The Dutch icon doubts whether Maresca and the Chelsea leadership share a unified vision.
The upcoming home game against Tottenham, a crucial match for Chelsea fans, could be a decisive moment.
In an extensive interview, Gullit, now part of the Laureus Academy, questioned Chelsea`s current direction.
Gullit, 62, also shared with Sun Sport his opinion that Ruben Amorim needs time at Manchester United, commented on the “backlash” against Marcus Rashford for speaking on social issues, and expressed his bewilderment at Liverpool fans criticizing Trent Alexander-Arnold.
Gullit on Chelsea
For me, Chelsea is still somewhat of a puzzle. I`m unsure of their actual quality, whether they are good or bad.
They seem to be searching for their identity.
They are gradually trying to climb up the league table and might eventually compete for the title.
However, I`m still uncertain about their precise position.
People often mention Chelsea`s frequent managerial changes as a problem – which isn`t new information.
I struggle to understand their true objectives. It seems even success doesn`t guarantee job security for a coach there.
Therefore, Chelsea remains an enigma. I`m trying to understand their core values, their philosophy, and the style of football they aim to play.
Currently, they lack a clear identity and consistent approach.
A solid foundation is essential for any club.
Success cannot always be bought; sometimes, patience and a consistent philosophy are necessary.
Perhaps Chelsea is now beginning to adopt this philosophy by focusing on young players.
However, these aren`t academy graduates; they are purchased players, requiring patience for development.
During Mourinho`s era, there was a clear understanding of the situation. Whether you agreed with it or not, you knew what to expect.
They had a strong and highly successful team.
But now, the path forward is unclear. We still lack a definitive direction.
Manchester United
The toughest task for any manager is joining mid-season, as Ruben Amorim did at United.
Especially when joining a team already facing difficulties.
It`s understandable to seize the opportunity, thinking, ‘This might be my only chance with Manchester United.’
However, judging Ruben fairly requires waiting until next season, when he can prepare properly, acquire desired players, and release those he deems unnecessary.
It`s been challenging. Joining in such circumstances risks damaging one`s reputation.
Making a significant impact mid-season is difficult, though there are exceptions like David Moyes at Everton. Generally, mid-season changes don`t yield drastic improvements.
Amorim hasn`t had a fair chance to demonstrate his capabilities yet.
He needs a full season, starting from the summer, to implement his strategies and bring in suitable players. Only then can we properly evaluate his performance.
Spanish Domination
Currently, the top two football teams are Spanish: the national team and Real Madrid.
Both are exceptional and leading contenders for the Laureus World Sports Team of the Year Award.
Spain`s performance in the Euros, especially the talent of Lamine Yamal, a fellow nominee, is remarkable.
Spanish football is clearly regaining dominance. Their teams are incredibly strong.
Real Madrid`s ability to adapt and transform throughout a season is particularly impressive.
Before Christmas, their Champions League progression seemed uncertain.
Now, they appear poised to win it again.
Marcus Rashford
A challenge for athletes is their brief career span.
With perhaps only 16 years at the top, their focus must be primarily on their sport.
Balancing sports with politics or activism is difficult.
Marcus Rashford`s commendable work in England on school meals is a prime example.
His initiative to help children in schools was excellent.
However, he faced criticism, accused of being distracted from football by his off-field activities.
This criticism was unfair and unjust.
It highlights the difficulty for athletes to speak on political or human rights issues without facing backlash, even when their intentions are good.
Athletes are often criticized for not speaking out, but experiences like Rashford`s explain why they often remain silent. Speaking up can easily backfire, creating a no-win situation.
Liverpool
Arne Slot`s rapid success was unexpected.
His smooth transition at Liverpool is partly due to the groundwork already in place.
Liverpool had a clear understanding of Jurgen Klopp`s approach and his methods.
Klopp was hired to implement a specific, attacking style of football, which proved successful with a 4-3-3 formation.
When Klopp announced his departure, Liverpool sought a successor who could maintain a similar style.
While there are minor tactical adjustments, the overall approach remains consistent.
This strategy should be adopted by more clubs.
First, define the club`s DNA and playing style, then appoint coaches who fit that vision. Liverpool exemplified this approach.
Arne Slot has performed exceptionally well, surprising many, including myself.
Knowing Slot, he is a likeable, intelligent, and articulate individual, fluent in English.
He`s also excellent in team management and psychology, contributing to his success, for which I am pleased.
Trent Alexander-Arnold
The negative reaction to Trent Alexander-Arnold potentially joining Real Madrid is puzzling and incomprehensible to me.
Perhaps it`s just my perspective, but the intense criticism directed at him makes no sense.
The world`s biggest club wants him – it`s that simple.
The appropriate response should be, ‘He has been fantastic for us, congratulations on the move and best of luck.’
Why isn`t this a normal reaction? Why is it considered so strange?
Just recently, when he was out of the team, many advocated for Conor Bradley to take his place at right-back.
Now, because Alexander-Arnold might move to Real Madrid, there`s widespread discontent.
I fail to grasp the logic.
We`re talking about Real Madrid, arguably the greatest club globally. It`s a fantastic opportunity for him. We should be happy for his success.
The uproar is unwarranted. If he were leaving Liverpool for a less prestigious club solely for financial gain, then perhaps skepticism would be justified.
But it`s Real Madrid. Real Madrid!
Marcus Bellamy