Chelsea`s owners, despite previous disagreements, are now in agreement regarding the future of Stamford Bridge: they aim to demolish the current stadium.
Todd Boehly, the club chairman, has emphasized the need for unity within the boardroom to move forward with plans for a new, larger stadium to replace the existing, constrained ground.
Sources indicate that co-owner Behdad Eghbali has reconciled his differing business views with Boehly and now supports a complete reconstruction of Stamford Bridge, rather than just redeveloping the current structure.
Boehly, favoring a total rebuild of Chelsea`s 40,173-capacity home in West London, has stated, “I think we’re going to be building something new.”
Stamford Bridge has been Chelsea`s cherished home since 1905. However, due to limited space and various constraints, remaining at the current location might be the only feasible option, despite the desire for expansion.
According to a club insider, “A remodel of Stamford Bridge is not a practical solution. A complete rebuild is the only viable path forward.”
This ambitious project would necessitate finding a temporary home ground for Chelsea for an estimated five to seven years. Potential temporary venues considered include Wembley Stadium, as Tottenham previously utilized, and possibly Earl’s Court or Twickenham`s Allianz Stadium, the home of England rugby.
The club recently acquired properties near the West Stand, yet challenges persist in modernizing Stamford Bridge. The stadium`s location presents obstacles, with a Tube line bordering one end and hotels adjacent to the Shed End.
A club source mentioned, “Earl’s Court is among the few local areas with available space, but multiple stakeholders are involved there.”
Dan Silver, a board member of the Chelsea Supporters’ Trust, commented, “If demolition of Stamford Bridge is the chosen route, it is hoped it will be executed efficiently. Increasing the club`s revenue streams is essential.”
Marcus Bellamy