The third encounter between boxing titans Katie Taylor and Amanda Serrano promised a definitive end to one of the sport`s most significant rivalries. What transpired was less a blood-and-guts war like their previous meetings, and more a tactical demonstration that, while perhaps less thrilling for some, solidified Taylor`s place atop their shared history and underscored the strategic evolution of women`s boxing on a global stage.
For two previous battles, Katie Taylor largely fought Amanda Serrano`s fight – engaging in relentless, toe-to-toe exchanges that captivated audiences and, crucially, thrust women`s boxing into an unprecedented spotlight. This high-octane approach, against the persistent advice of her corner, delivered memorable spectacles that ultimately went Taylor`s way via closely contested decisions. These were the fights that broke viewership records and proved women could not only headline major venues like Madison Square Garden but deliver the kind of action that demands attention.
This time, Taylor seemingly decided she had done enough for the highlight reels. She finally listened to the counsel urging caution and intelligent movement. The third fight saw her box smart, utilizing her speed and skill from distance, making the fight significantly less hazardous for herself. The result? A clear majority decision victory that left little room for debate about who was the superior fighter in *this* specific contest. It was, perhaps ironically, the “easy” fight her team had requested all along, finally delivered at the trilogy`s close.
Amanda Serrano, conversely, opted for a different strategy in the rubber match. Known for her aggressive, pressure-fighting style that troubled Taylor in their previous encounters, “The Real Deal” chose to box from the outside, attempting to work behind longer punches. This tactical shift, intended to be “smarter, not harder,” proved to be her undoing. It negated her natural strengths – her power and ability to overwhelm opponents at close range – and played directly into Taylor`s strengths as a mobile, skilled boxer. It was, arguably, the wrong fight at the wrong time for Serrano, resulting in a performance that fell flat compared to her previous heroic efforts.
While the third fight itself may not grace as many “Fight of the Year” lists as its predecessors, the trilogy as a whole has irrevocably changed the landscape of women`s boxing. The first two fights, with their compelling narratives and incredible action, built the platform. The third fight capitalized on it, providing the backdrop for a historic all-women`s card streamed to millions globally on Netflix. This event wasn`t just about the main event; it was an opportunity for multiple world champions and rising contenders to showcase their talents.
Among those who seized the moment was Shadasia Green. Facing the heavily favored former champion Savannah Marshall on the undercard, Green, who had faced setbacks and doubts, delivered a career-best performance. Despite an early point deduction, she battled back in an entertaining contest, securing a hard-fought split decision upset. This victory not only earned her titles but immediately positioned her as a potential major opponent for pound-for-pound queen Claressa Shields, setting the stage for another potentially massive fight born directly from the visibility provided by the Taylor-Serrano phenomenon. The ripple effects of this rivalry continue to reshape the sport, proving that calculated risks (like the early brawls) can pave the way for strategic victories (like Taylor`s third win) and unforeseen opportunities for others.